Skip to content

Respect a two-way political lesson

This letter to the editor speaks about how people think about politicians and what they really do
8162201_web1_170628-PON-ponoka-news-letters_1

Dear Editor;

Seven months after the U.S. presidential inauguration, there might be lessons to be learned.

The word ‘politician’ sometimes suggests motivations that are unethical and a self-interest that outweighs a true focus on the public interest. Despite political stereotypes and recent poor examples, politicians are a critical link in how human beings organize themselves.

They deal with complex issues in a rule-bound system that they negotiate daily. Sometimes, this involves talking to angry constituents or political adversities who want to be heard, but might not want nuanced answers.

In political parties, there often is a range of opinion. To function from within, politicians sometimes have to down play differences for the sake of other priorities and party unity. Compromise then becomes the default to advance policy.

In a deeply social and interactive environment like a legislative chamber, politicians need skills to engage in multiple relationships in which opinions differ. To maintain those relationships requires emotional awareness and sensitivity.

Being articulate, relevant and informed is a big part of being effective. That has always been politics’ bread and butter, whether it involves presenting policies or ideas. However, the silent skill of being an engaged listener often goes unnoticed.

There are likely more politicians than we imagine who see their work as public servants. They are the ones who do their best because that’s what they expect of themselves.

Without a functioning and effective government, despite what we might think of politicians, many initiatives might degenerate into an ad hoc, fly by the seat of your pants, banana republic administration.

George Jason