County updates notification process following shooting range concerns

Conflict surrounding the rezoning and development of Blackmore Shooting Sports clay course has led to the County...

County of Wetaskiwin No.10

Conflict surrounding the rezoning and development of Blackmore Shooting Sports clay course has led to the County of Wetaskiwin changing its notification process to reflect the full range of requirements as specified within the Municipal Government Act.

Nearby landowner Georgina Smith spoke with council during its Nov. 10 planning and economic development meeting regarding how landowners were notified of the rezoning and development, as well as issues she has regarding Blackmore’s execution of its development permit stipulations.

Smith stood before council representing 28 other individuals who were also unhappy with the county’s notification process.

County development officer Jarvis Grant says in an email to the Pipestone Flyer, “only three individuals, representing the same parcel of land located within the County of Wetaskiwin, were notified by the County in accordance with the requirements outlined in the Municipal Government Act (MGA).”

Six more individuals, representing three parcels of land, located in Ponoka County, were not properly notified in accordance with the MGA. The remaining individuals represented by Smith would not have been directly notified by the County of Wetaskiwin in accordance with section 606.

“The Ponoka County parcels were missed because the County of Wetaskiwin notification process for planning and development issues was in accordance with Section 606 of the MGA, which covered the County landowners, but did not include Section 692, which covered Ponoka County landowners),” said Grant.

“We are disappointed with the lack of consultation that occurred,” said Smith during her delegation with council.

Moving forward, the County of Wetaskiwin will include section 692 in proposals and amendments to rezone, as well as land-use bylaws, municipal development plans, area structure plans and other statutory plans. “Of these, rezonings are the only things in which written notice is to be mailed to adjacent landowners in an adjacent municipality. Development permits are not subject to Section 692,” said Grant.

Regarding other concerns of the operation, including noise and alcohol, the county will be working with the developer and landowners to address their concerns.

 

Just Posted

Ponoka RCMP respond to intoxicated male in Golden Leisure Lodge

On May 15, 2019 the Ponoka RCMP responded to a complaint of… Continue reading

Town to sign five-year policing agreement with Ponoka Stampede

The Town of Ponoka will go ahead with a five-year renewable agreement… Continue reading

UPDATED: Ponoka RCMP arrest male on Canada wide warrant

UPDATE for Immediate Release: Collin James Courteoreille was wanted on a Canada… Continue reading

Trudeau touts economic record at Liberal fundraiser in Vancouver

The Prime Minister was in B.C. for much of this week

School bus crash in Edmonton sends 12 to hospital, 2 with broken bones

Alberta Health Services said there were no life-threatening injuries

Crews fight fire with fire to keep blaze from northern Alberta town

The wildfire now covers some 920 square kilometres

Supreme Court of Canada won’t hear Alberta murder appeals

Sheena Cuthill and her husband Timothy Rempel were found guilty three years ago of killing Ryan Lane

Pipeline protester chimes in on Justin Trudeau’s B.C. fundraising speech

The government purchased the Trans Mountain pipeline and expansion project for $4.5 billion

Canada stripping citizenship from Chinese man over alleged marriage fraud

The move comes amid severely strained relations between Ottawa and Beijing

Mayor says northern Alberta town still under threat from nearby wildfire

The blaze has now eaten its way through about 920 square kilometres of forest

Bashaw RCMP assist Stettler in arrest

Man out on bail sitting in custody after vehicle theft spree

Ottawa spending $24.5M to research health benefits, risks of pot use

$390,000 will fund two cannabis public awareness

Most Read