Just An Observation: Hands off the helicopters

No need to review service that isn’t government-funded

Why is there even a review being done?

In case the public is unaware, the province’s health services department — a.k.a. the provincial government — has initiated a review of how Alberta’s medical helicopter services are being operated, how they do their job and what the most effective funding model is.

But like the question at the top asks — Why?

The province’s major service provider, Shock Trauma Air Rescue Service (STARS), only receives about 20 per cent of their annual budget of around $38 million from the provincial government. That works out to around $7.5 million, while the rest all comes from donations — be it corporations, individuals, municipal partners and their annual lottery.

There is only one other standalone medical helicopter service in Alberta; HALO Air Ambulance based in Medicine Hat, and covering a large chunk of the southern portion of the province, using paramedics from the local Alberta Health Services (AHS) station just a couple of minutes from the HALO base.

HALO is completely funded by municipal, corporate and individual donations. The province did kick in a one-time payment of $1 million in 2018, but only because the non-profit purchased a new helicopter, which has nearly tripled HALO’s operational costs to about $2.6 million.

There is a helicopter company in Fort McMurray that assists within a 400 km radius of Fort Mac, using paramedics from that city’s fire department, but only because STARS has not been able to serve the area.

So back to that question of why is the province conducting a review.

AHS explains that the various operations — while all vital — have differing levels of service and clinical capabilities. Therefore, it wants to see how people view the services in order to explore what changes to regulations or criteria need to be made.

One part of this review is an extremely short three-question survey asking if the current best practices are appropriate guidelines, the reasoning behind their answer and when helicopters shouldn’t be used for transport.

It also asks people to check who they represent — patient, healthcare worker, elected official, public — and provides another option for asking a question.

That’s all they ask. That is what they call public engagement and consultation.

When a review is done, shouldn’t there be a bit more to the discussion?

What about the severe lack of provincial financial resources being directed to these supposedly ‘vital’ emergency services? How can these operations be expected to provide similar levels of service when only one gets even a drop in the bucket funding from the provincial government?

If these operations are getting the job done now, what is the real point behind the review?

Judging from the survey, it’s all about coming up with a new model for service delivery while refusing to put money on the table to pay for it.

One has to wonder, just how much of this review is part of the AHS mandate or whether it is being driven by the provincial health minister’s office — or more likely the Premier’s office.

It’s hard to believe that AHS would ask the general public about what incidents should or shouldn’t warrant a medical helicopter.

Shouldn’t that be a decision based on medical necessity, availability of access to quick and proper treatment and of course weather conditions to make flight to the scene suitable and safe?

And the people that are in the best position to make those decisions are already on the inside — health professionals that work directly with the air rescue service providers and the providers themselves.

But that is…just an observation.

AB OpinionsAlbertaUCP

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

RCMP on hunt for man who has skipped court

Public urged to call 911 if they spot him

Update: Local bull riders help Canada to fourth at PBR Global Cup

Lambert, Hansen manage to earn two of Canadian team’s good rides

Ponoka County wants more information prior to approving permit

Council not satisfied, wants better details about work site and other issues

Ponoka County, Rimbey approve recreation deal

Agreement worked out as part of ICF negotiations

VIDEO: Ottawa wants quick, peaceful resolution to pipeline protests, Trudeau says

The protests have manifested themselves as blockades on different rail lines across the country

Trudeau says Wet’suwet’en crisis, rail blockades a critical moment for country

First Nations leaders suggest it may be time to peacefully end the blockades

Falun Outdoor Classic hits the rink Feb. 22

Intense CACA action featuring Augustana Vikings, SAIT Trojans

Stettler County awaits Summer Village responses on possible amendment to Buffalo Lake development plan

Amendment could allow for more lots at the controversial Buffalo Lake RV Resort

AFN national chief calls for calm on Wet’suwet’en crisis, rail blockades

Hereditary chiefs in the Wet’suwet’en First Nation oppose the natural-gas pipeline

Federal, B.C. ministers seek meeting with Wet’suwet’en in hope of blockade solution

Coastal GasLink signed agreements with all 20 elected band councils along the pipeline route

Flight to evacuate Canadians from cruise ship ‘expected’ to depart Japan on Thursday

Canadians seeking to return to home by commercial means will be subject to the Quarantine Act

Trudeau tightlipped on plan to end protests ‘quickly and peacefully’

The prime minister, who cancelled a two-day trip to Barbados this week to deal with the crisis at home

Canadian standards for coronavirus protection to be reviewed, health agency says

The protocols set out how health workers should protect themselves and their patients

Most Read